Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  52 / 241 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 52 / 241 Next Page
Page Background

12-A Maine Antique Digest, December 2016

Margot Johnson Is Back

by Lita Solis-Cohen

E

ight years after Margot Johnson

closed her gallery at 65th Street and

Lexington Avenue and announced her

retirement, she is back in New York City

with a new gallery at 17 East 70th Street

specializing in furniture and decorative

arts made for the Gilded Age in the last

half of the 19th century.

“I absolutely love these things; I have

always collected them myself,” she said

while seated in a Pottier & Stymus arm-

chair, surrounded by carved and gilded

bronze ladies and surveying a large room

filled with assorted cabinets, consoles,

chairs, and tables by Christian Herter and

by Louis Comfort Tiffany, and two tables

by Pottier & Stymus, both with elabo-

rately inlaid tops by the French marquetry

master Joseph Cremer.

“I missed working with these master-

pieces, and I have a feeling that the market

for Aesthetic Movement furniture is com-

ing back,” she said when asked why she

had returned to the market now. “Prices

are much less than the last time around,”

she said. “Christie’s sale in December did

better than I thought it would, and Stair

has been selling this period well. I have

been watching the market carefully, buy-

ing a masterpiece or two now and then

and selling it to a museum, and I got

bored. I wanted to do more.”

An apartment for rent sign gave her

the impetus to return to the trade. “Last

June when I came back from our house

in France, there was a for rent sign on the

apartment next door,” she said. “It is per-

fect for a gallery.”

Her instincts may be right. The very

first week after she opened her new gal-

lery in October she had reserve tags on

seven pieces of furniture, and a week

later four of them had been sold, all to

museums.

Johnson has always been on top of the

goings-on in the marketplace. “In the

last years I have put all my energy into

restoring our fourteenth-century house in

France; I furnished it with the simplest

Herter Brothers,” she said.

Collecting is her passion. “I fell in

love with the furnishings of the Gilded

Age when my cousin Marilynn Johnson

asked me to proofread the catalog for the

Metropolitan Museum 1970 centennial

exhibition

19th Century America: Furniture and Other

Decorative Arts

.” Much of the scholarship in that cat-

alog was new. The Met had acquired about half of the

objects expressly for the exhibit, and they ranged from

Federal furniture to Greene & Greene and included all

the revivals: Gothic, Rococo, and Renaissance. John-

son got into this market on the ground level and made

furniture of the Gilded Age her life’s work, traveling

anywhere a piece of interest surfaced.

“Give me a year to see if I am prescient about the

revival of this marketplace,” she said.

For more information, call Margot Johnson at (646)

512-0014.

This circa 1870 center table with an ebon-

ized cherry and walnut base with original

gilt incising is by Pottier & Stymus, New

York. It is 31½" high with a 36" x 55" top.

Its colorful marquetry top was made by

Joseph Cremer (1811-1878), the premier

maker of fine marquetry in Paris from 1839

to 1878. Its central design of two tigers in a

jungle drinking at a stream is surrounded

by a wide, leafy border with two urns and

with writhing snakes at each end. It is on

reserve for a major museum. It is $175,000.

Margot Johnson is not the only one who believes

that Aesthetic Movement items are back on the

“need it / want it / buy it” horizon. Dealer Jill

Fenichell of Brooklyn, New York, is selling a col-

lection of fine ceramics assembled by a NewYork

state collector, including a vase over 4' tall, dec-

orated by Florence Lewis with a duck-hunting

scene on a ocher ground, that was formerly in the

Harriman Judd collection. Fenichell is also sell-

ing a Martin Brothers floor vase, a Dragon vase

by Royal Worcester, and several examples of Pilk-

ington’s Royal Lancastrian lusterware, including

a Richard Joyce vase with deer alternating with

trees. To see this collection, go to the website (www.

jillfenichellinc.com

) and click on ceramics and then

19th century. Everything is priced.

This maple, rosewood marquetry, mirror glass, and gilded Herter Brothers

Neo-Grec style console table is 39" x 79" x 21½". It was made for W.H. Van-

derbilt’s first house in New York City, on Fifth Avenue at 40th Street. Written

in script in pencil on top underneath the silk velvet is “W.H. Vanderbilt / 40

(St).” It was in the traveling Herter Brothers exhibition in 1994 and 1995,

shown in New York City, Houston, and Atlanta, and is pictured in the catalog

as #12. There is currently an exhibition on view in the American Wing at the

Metropolitan Museum of Art of furniture made by Herter Brothers for W.H.

Vanderbilt, Christian Herter’s most important client.

This large (53" x 30¼" x 20½") Tiffany

armchair is a unique Japanesque design

that combines the talents of Louis Com-

fort Tiffany and Lockwood de Forest, two

of the team of four that formedAssociated

Artists. Samuel Colman and Candace

Wheeler were the other two. The back

panel was carved in India at Lockwood de

Forest’s studio. The original carpet seat

has been replaced with a similar fabric.

London Gallery Files Suit against Agnes Martin Catalogue Raisonné

F

rom 2009 to 2013 the Mayor Gallery

of London sold 13 works by Agnes

Martin (1912-2004), who was an Abstract

Expressionist and Minimalist painter.

When those artworks were submitted to

the Agnes Martin Catalogue Raisonné,

they were all rejected, causing Mayor

Gallery to issue some refunds. There are

some big numbers involved. Mayor Gal-

lery claimed it has been damaged in the

amount of $7,233,438—the amount paid

by the buyers that has already been or must

be refunded to the buyers.

On October 17 Mayor Gallery filed

suit against the Agnes Martin Catalogue

Raisonné LLC, Arnold Glimcher, Tif-

fany Bell, and unnamed members of the

authentication committee. The lawsuit

details several sales and rejections by the

Agnes Martin Catalogue Raisonné.

The Mayor Gallery sold

Day & Night

,

a 72" x 72" acrylic on canvas, signed “To

Delphine, Agnes Martin, 1961‑64,” to

Jack Levy for $2.9 million in Septem-

ber 2010. In May 2014

Day & Night

was

delivered to the Agnes Martin Catalogue

Raisonné. On September 25, 2014, Levy

received notice that

Day & Night

would

not be included in the Agnes Martin

Catalogue Raisonné. After the rejection,

Mayor Gallery honored its warranty of

authenticity, took back the picture, and

refunded Levy his money.

Mayor Gallery wanted to resubmit the

picture to the committee and correct errors

in the provenance and to add more infor-

mation, including an exhibition history, a

photo of

Day & Night

with Agnes Martin

in the foreground, and more. According

to court papers, James Mayor met person-

ally with Tiffany Bell, editor of the Agnes

Martin Catalogue Raisonné, in New York

City. Mayor asked for names of the mem-

bers of the authentication committee but

was told they were “confidential.” Mayor

also questioned Arnold Glimcher’s bona

fides. (Glimcher, who formed the Agnes

Martin Catalogue Raisonné and is a man-

aging member, is the owner of Pace Gal-

lery in New York City, which represents

the estate of Agnes Martin.)

Mayor also asked “whether the art

world should refuse to cooperate and

support Agnes Martin Catalogue Rai-

sonné. He was concerned that Glim-

cher’s obvious conflicts of interest, and

the longstanding frictions and disagree-

ments that existed between him and

Glimcher, prevented an objective and fair

vetting of submitted artworks, including

of

Day & Night

,” the suit states.

Mayor was told it was unnecessary to

resubmit

Day & Night

, and it was rejected

again.

In 2009 Patricia and Frank Kolodny

bought an untitled work by Martin from

Mayor Gallery for $240,000. The ink and

yellow wash on paper was signed and

dated “A. Martin ’59.” Johanna Kolodny,

who was given the picture, submitted it

to the Agnes Martin Catalogue Raisonné

on August 2015. A letter dated Novem-

ber 24, 2015, from the Agnes Martin

Catalogue Raisonné rejected the picture.

Kolodny has held on to the painting and

received no refund, but according to the

suit will retain ownership “only until and

if” Mayor Gallery can establish that it is

“authentic and marketable.”

Sybil Shainwald bought

The Invisible

,

a 1957 graphite on paper, signed and

titled by Agnes Martin, for $180,000 in

December 2012. In August 2015 it was

rejected by the Agnes Martin Catalogue

Raisonné. Mayor Gallery refunded Shain-

wald’s money.

Pierre de Labouchère bought ten Mar-

tin works from Mayor Gallery in 2013,

all acrylic on canvas, for approximately

$3,625,000. When submitted to the Agnes

Martin Catalogue Raisonné in 2014, they

were all rejected. Labouchère considered

demanding a refund but is holding on to

the works for now.

Mayor Gallery has asked for further

information regarding the rejections and

has received no answer. Its complaint

alleges product disparagement and notes

that statements made in the rejections

thus signal to the art world that the art-

works “were fakes.” The gallery also

alleges tortious interference with contract

and with prospective business relations,

and negligent misrepresentation.

Mayor Gallery signed an examination

agreement when it wanted to resubmit

Day & Night

with further documentation.

That agreement indemnified the Agnes

Martin Catalogue Raisonné, the commit-

tee members, and more. “No legal action

or legal claim of any kind shall be made

by you against AMCR and the AMCR

companies and Personnel based upon this

agreement,” one of the clauses reads.

The New York State Senate has passed

twice a protection bill for art authentica-

tors—in June 2015 (vote, 61-1) and April

2016 (59-1). The bill, however, hasn’t

moved out of the Assembly’s Cultural

Affairs, Tourism, Parks and Recreation

Committee. The bill, sponsored by Sen-

ator Betty Little, would ensure that art

authenticators practicing in good faith

would be granted protection under the

law and would specify that any claims

against authenticators be proven by “clear

and convincing evidence.”